An alarming percentage of 'radical right' people are obsessed with genitals and children. And - disturbingly - the combination thereof.
Strangely enough conservatives are terrified of transwomen entering ladies' dressing- and bathrooms. But why don't they worry about actual men do the same? A certain US president even bragged about walking in on teens in various stages of undressing.
Radical right people are waiting in line to stand at the doors of bath- and dressingrooms to check on the genitals of every single person walking in. A disturbing obsession.
While you can almost bet the perpetrator is a conservative when a child is sexually abused, they keep blaming 'the left!', 'trans!', 'gays!', 'drag!' from doing what they dream of doing. Unfortunately: quite often conservatives not only dream of sexually molesting children.
'Christian' school principal and coach Kevin Hobbs has been arrested for posession of pictures of sexually abused children. Twice. Which raises the question: why was he not jailed after the first time and allowed to keep working with young children?
Since the radical right loves people like themselves, Donald Trump pardonned Jonathan Braun, a drug dealer who assaulted a 3 year-old child.
Should all child abusers have to face jailtime or only if they're Democrats and/or allign themselves with 'the rainbow coalition', like Matthew Inman?
Could not find any information on Inman's religious believes but someone's religion should not have any iufluence on that person's punishment for child abuse. 'Person'? You surely mean 'that man's'! Nope. Believe it or not, also women can be (sexual) child predators. In the US around 8% of all offenders is female.
The Great Leader himself has been found guilty on charges of sexual assault himself while his close friendship with Jeffrey Epstein - famous for throwing parties with famous people and minors offering sexual services - and facts like his daughter Ivanka living with him in the White House during the start of his first term as president while his wife lived in New York, raises questions.
Is it normal behaviour for a father to have his teenage daughter sitting on his lap, both enjoying her jumping up and down and wiggling her bottom?
In 'The Land of the Free' conservatives are pushing laws to allow referees and coaches to stick their hands in children's underwear to check if they are the 'right' gender to participate in children's sports.
Officially 'because girls who used to be boys have an unfair advantage in competing'. 1] Children's sports should not be about competing and 'being the best' but about having fun, getting enough excercise and learning how to cooperate and be social. 2] Changing gender hardly ever gives anyone an unfair advantage over others, except where just the amount of musle tissue can make a difference.
"Yeah, but by default men are better runners than women so transwomen should not be allowed to compete in running!" Interesting that you think that because often women outperform men in ultra marathons.
By nature's design different people have different (dis)advantages over others. For example: swimmers Pieter van den Hoogenband and his arch nemesis Ian Thorpe and their most formidable opponent were genetically different from all their competitors; van den Hoogenband was born with a rare 'arch' in his back, making his body more aerodynamic and Ian Thorpe had unusual large 'flipper feet' and Michael Phelps was born with twice the lung capacity of 'normal' men, making him extremely hard to beat in long distance events.
Should they have been excluded from events in which it was only exciting to see who would go home with forth place because van den Hoogenband, Thorpe and Phelps would usually take the Gold, Silver and Bronze?
If men really want to change their gender so they can make a lot of money in women's sports, they're not very smart, are they?
What those who sinply repeat soundbites of their right wing leaders don't know, is that it used to be normal that men and women would compete in the same sports events. Like Olympic archery.
Because a lot of men started to complain that they didn't like being defeated by women, they demanded men and women should be divided while performing in sports events. It's true. Bigly.
In short: demanding people be banned from a certain sports event based on gender or even skin colour is primerarely rooted in racism and misogyny.
If gender or skin colour really is an issue in competetive sports, why do jockeys and their horses have different genders and skin colours?
=====================
A donation (click) is much appreciated:
Posts
